Is there no advantage that the proponents of Measure CL will not press?
Another mail piece hit our mailboxes today using Sean Evans, school cop, as a prop in the advertising campaign. We reproduce part of it above. You'd think that the Claremont Police would have a policy against officers in uniform advertising for a political campaign, but then, this is Claremont. It's probably only a policy when someone outside the power elite wants to do it. Did Officer Evans have no idea he was being used?--or did he readily assent to a photoshoot in costume? So many questions...
He gave them a nice quote, anyway. Or at least the consultant in San Francisco put a nice quote in his mouth. Really. Does anyone actually say, "Local funding for student safety that can't be taken away by Sacramento is a win-win for Claremont schools."
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/dee22/dee22f7b98144860d034754a45e8de1b9f25b4b1" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/81d41/81d41e27c4c313169b6dc755ae5e11b068bb4759" alt=""
Look for there to be a short flurry of noise, ritual wringing of hands, and the matter will be swept under the rug because, well, it's for the kids.
Anything goes when you're doing it for the kids, and Piper Jaffray.
And while we are on the subject of kids, we've been noticing this: there are a lot of kids in those flyers and their faces are more or less recognizable. Since we here at the Insider really do put kids' safety first, we've been careful to blur out our kids faces (or otherwise obliterate them, see below). Does the consultant have permission from the parents to use these kids this way? And is it OK to use pictures of kids and classes, apparently taken on school time, for political advertising? So many questions...
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/69ae1/69ae15eabf733b303b972d5d8a1a0a65e4d08b41" alt=""
As we post this late Wednesday, the mailer is still on the website.